🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially return the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in other EU countries